About the author

Vicky Davis

Vicky Davis, was a Computer Systems Analyst/Programmer turned Internet Researcher and writer. She received her training in computer programming in Santa Clara, California in mid 1970s. She worked primarily – but not entirely on IBM mainframe systems for large corporations and government entities. As an Internet Researcher, she continues to apply her Systems Analyst skills focusing her research on the revolution in government from the systems perspective. She has two websites: ' ' http://www.thetechnocratictyranny.com (newer website) http://www.channelingreality.com (older website)

Related Articles


  1. 1

    Patricia Badish

    Very good article….the truth will prevail. I really believe it will.

  2. 2


    You sorry sellouts!!! idaho 3%ers are sellouts and this article is wrong. My wife is going to start posting the truths that you sellouts cant deny. You will not stop the truth. we are legion. We do not forgive we do not forget. EXPECT US!

    1. 2.1


      You’d better clear your mind first because you’ve contradicted yourself in a single paragraph.


      Get back on your meds.

  3. 3

    Anthony Dephue

    My name is Anthony Dephue. I authored the Idaho III% press release in question.

    Let me first say that there is no question that Mike Emry is a solid voice in the alternative media platform. He has covered relevant events that the mainstream media ignores because the agenda of the meeting isn’t congruent with theirs. For this, Mike Emry deserves praise and gratitude from all of us.

    I have attended various events, from rallies to hearings at the Statehouse where Mike faithfully covered the events. Some were Idaho III% sanctioned events, others were events open to the public that Mike felt were of importance. His coverage and interviews were always fair. I have always respected Mike for his activism as a journalist.

    The purpose of that press release is two-fold. First, Mike may have traveled to Burns, OR with the Idaho III%. I traveled with other companions that day, so I wasn’t there. What I do know is that Mike claimed to have been embedded with the Idaho III%. See: ( http://tvoinews.net/michael/michael-emry-a-notch-in-the-gavel-of-a-new-judge-part-2/ ). This article reads: “He was there as the embedded reporter for the Idaho III% […]”. The Idaho III% is simply clarifying this to say that they consider him a media contact, not an “embedded” reporter.

    Second, the Idaho III% wants to make sure that there are not any claims to the contrary going forward. The testimony in 2004 is public record. While it may be labeled as jumping “in bed” with the media, the entire 281 pages of that day’s courtroom transcript are open to the public. That was the source for that section of the press release. At no point did Les Zaitz or any other media outlet factor in to the information that was disseminated.

    Case 3:2002-cr-00053 Document 558

    – Page 72: Mike Emry – “I built upwards of 66 machine guns, belt fed, and submachine guns and AK 47s and the like”.

    – Page 74: Mike Emry – “after I tested it over and over, I proceeded with installing the C-4, with some carboard box, wrapping tape around it very tightly, all the electrical components behind it, […]”. Page 76: “I put it in a cardboard box, and about a day later I met Ken at his office and handed it over to him.”

    – Page 90: Mike Emry – “This is the silencer that I built for him. A hundred percent.”

    If Les Zaitz also came to the conclusion that Mike built a bomb, manufactured a silencer, and assembled dozens of machines guns… well, I guess even a blind squirrel finds a nut; or he just read the same document I did filed as public record in the courts.

    We can split hairs over violation vs. crime, although I would point out that Document 1 in Mike’s Oregon case has in big, bold letters “Criminal Complaint”. I would also consider the person from whom Mike took the weapon to be a victim of theft since Mike, according to affidavits, stated post-Miranda that he took the weapon without the owner’s knowledge.

    Nothing said was designed to throw Mike Emry under any bus. It was a series of factual statements engineered to correct the misconception that Mike was an “embedded” reporter. It does not, and should not, reflect on his status as a journalist in the realm of alternative media. Some of Mike’s past dealings are unpleasant. Rather than be angry at the press release, why not focus on disseminating clarifying information.

    No one was attacked in that press release… perhaps reconsider attacking the messenger?

    1. 3.1


      Mr. Dephue, you have a bizarre way of expressing your gratitude if this press release is any indication.

      Cutting to the chase – I haven’t seen it but I understand that there is a facebook post by Brandon (I think) – that expresses the fear that Michael is going to “sell out” the III%. I don’t know where that is coming from – but it’s not true. The subject of the Idaho III% has not even been broached in Michael’s case and I know that because I talk to him nearly every day. Not to be unkind, but it seems there is an exaggerated sense of importance associated with that thinking. The III% is not an issue on any level in Michael’s case.

      As to the “embedded reporter” business, there are videos recorded at the time that are in the public domain where Michael said that – without objection from the Idaho III% Mr. Dephue. You can’t change history with a disclaimer after the fact. You can only explain it within the context in which it occurred. And again, it’s not important because Michael’s case has nothing to do with the occupation of Malheur or the Idaho III%. Les Zaitz tried to make a connection in the news through a shill named Scotty Willingham but that has been discredited so there hasn’t been any more written about that.

      As far as that 2004 case, there is a lot more to the story obviously than is printed in that transcript. Michael was not involved in the drug business nor was he manufacturing guns for criminals. That case was supposed to be sealed and most of it is still sealed – except magically (Les Zaitz?) the transcript with Michael’s testimony. How does that happen? We don’t know yet but Michael was under a gag order on it so he hasn’t been able to defend himself on it. The most important point is that Michael was not charged with any crimes. He did not make a deal to avoid prosecution. There are enough anomalies in that case that can be discerned from the transcript to cause any thinking person to question the entire proceeding. Before, during and after the case, Michael continued to build guns for a living under the omnipresent oversight of the ATF. What does that tell you Mr. Dephue? What it should tell you is that Michael was not the bad guy in that case otherwise he would have been sent to jail for a long time even with a deal from the prosecution.

      Les Zaitz has tried very hard to convict Michael in the media and the Idaho III% has now jumped on that bandwagon. If you continue to read what I’ve written about Michael’s case you’ll see that our criminal justice system is broken. There is an unholy alliance between the media and the criminals of the justice system. I could explain it to you but not here – it would take too much space and time. The important thing for you to know is that by your “selling out” Michael by hopping on the mainstream media bandwagon, it will not shield the Idaho III% from the out of control justice system. If they come after the Idaho III%, it won’t be because of anything Michael has done or said. Nor will it be because of anything I’ve written. It will be because they want to smash any and all forms nationalist, patriotic movements. In case you haven’t noticed, there is a global agenda to dismantle nation-states in favor of global, administrative system. As such, “they” being the criminals who control our government are trying to eliminate all national symbols, loyalties, values and especially patriots who hold those values dear and they are using the media – meaning people like Les Zaitz to “catapult the propaganda”.

      If you gain nothing else from what I’ve said, understand that there is a much larger agenda at work. The Idaho III%, Michael, the Bundys, et al, are just pawns in the bigger game. It would behoove you to try to understand that bigger game so that you don’t end up alienating the only friends you have which are your fellow patriots.


Leave a Reply

2014 Powered By Wordpress, Goodnews Theme By Momizat Team

%d bloggers like this: